(For) If Bristol City FC's football ground is moved to Aston Vale it will mean that the fans will have to travel further which will cost fans even more money and take longer to get to the ground. This might mean that less fans will travel to the home games and Bristol City FC will have less money to spend on players.
(For) The Bristol City football ground should stay at Ashton Gate because the local buisnesses (e.g bakery,chip shop,drink shops.) Would lose money and loss of money would mean loss of jobs.
(Against) I think Bristol City FC's should move to Ashton Vale because it gives them chance to play on a new ground and it gives them a new opportunity for a new start for the players.
(for) I think that they should not move because if people walk to City Vale they go in shops and get some thing to get like food and drinks and if they move they would not get eny money.
(FOR) Lewis is for Bristol City Football Club staying at Ashton Gate because some players were raised at Ashton Gate and can't turn they're back on it. By Lewis
(For) I think Bristol City should stay because players might be sad because they might not get used to they're new pitch and also they might not have any room for a car park and it might be a hasle to get to Ashton Vale and they might lose some of they're biggest fans and the fans might not know where the football stadium is and they might get confused. By Katie
if bristol city moved to ashton vale the players will be confused becuse of the diffrence of the pitch and will not play very well furthermore, meaning they will be lower in the league
(For) If Bristol City FC's football ground is moved to Aston Vale it will mean that the fans will have to travel further which will cost fans even more money and take longer to get to the ground. This might mean that less fans will travel to the home games and Bristol City FC will have less money to spend on players.
ReplyDelete(For) The Bristol City football ground should stay at Ashton Gate because the local buisnesses (e.g bakery,chip shop,drink shops.) Would lose money and loss of money would mean loss of jobs.
ReplyDelete(Against) I think Bristol City FC's should move to Ashton Vale because it gives them chance to play on a new ground and it gives them a new opportunity for a new start for the players.
ReplyDelete(for) I think that they should not move because if people walk to City Vale they go in shops and get some thing to get like food and drinks and if they move they would not get eny money.
ReplyDelete(FOR) It will cost more money to move than rebuild it because you will have to by the land aswell as everything else. By Ella
ReplyDelete(AGAINST) It will look newer and more bigger, more people , look nicer and they will get more money and by a better team aswell. By Ella
ReplyDelete(FOR) Lewis is for Bristol City Football Club staying at Ashton Gate because some players were raised at Ashton Gate and can't turn they're back on it. By Lewis
ReplyDelete(Against)I am against bristol city club staying because it will give them a fresh new start at Ashton Vale. by lewis
ReplyDelete(For) I think Bristol City should stay because players might be sad because they might not get used to they're new pitch and also they might not have any room for a car park and it might be a hasle to get to Ashton Vale and they might lose some of they're biggest fans and the fans might not know where the football stadium is and they might get confused. By Katie
ReplyDeleteif bristol city moved to ashton vale the players will be confused becuse of the diffrence of the pitch and will not play very well furthermore, meaning they will be lower in the league
ReplyDelete